The extraordinary set-piece that dominates the close of the second act – a vertiginous shoot-out along the winding ramps of the Guggenheim Museum – is an act of audacious vandalism. Bullets spray, bodies dive, spectators crouch in terror while glass art installations shatter and fall through the rotunda’s spiral well. The effect is one of playful destruction: a mockery of high culture values and pretensions and of the museum as a site of privileged voyeurism – not at all unlike a movie theater. What the melee destroys is not so much “priceless” works of art – those hallmarks of unique genius – as the economy of exchange that governs the art world’s marketplace values and dictates our habits for consuming them.
The film also gets points for a scene in which a former Stasi officer turned consultant meets with a hired assassin in art museum. As they gaze on a Renaissance-era painting depicting a face distorted by grief, the consultant asks the assassin why he likes the work> “I like the look of agony because I know it’s true,” he replies, quoting Dickinson. It’s delivered calmly, almost clinically – and it’s chilling.
The futility of the ending, embodied in Clive Owen’s exhausted state of unshaven dishevelment, is that the System cannot be brought to heel. Individuals can suffer street justice, but they will only be replaced by others, just as ruthlessly dedicated to the bottom line. As Jameson, Arrighi and Harvey have dismally noted: the totality of world capital has become a kind of self-replicating nanotechnology: a planet-eater, in sci-fi terms. Only the planet in question is not material substrate, but the living biosphere of human labor and human suffering.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.